8 Comments
User's avatar
Pal88's avatar

It’s the Mets increasing Turner’s value so LA will have to pay him more when they sign him. Sort of payback for the Bauer fiasco

Expand full comment
TheRealDDZ's avatar

I feel like I'm in the minority, but I feel good about Davis. His defense is obviously a weakness, but his bat is worthy of a starting spot. Turner is a heck of a player, but at 36 I'd rather roll the dice with what we have and spend the money on an arm.

Expand full comment
The Apple's avatar

I like Davis a lot. the only guy I'd really feel was a true, clear upgrade is Suarez. Turner would be nice, but is it money well spent?

Expand full comment
Flushing Fausto's avatar

It’s Doug LATTA, not Doug Matta, you imbecile.

Expand full comment
Paul Schwartz's avatar

Not sure if I want to trade Mauricio for a number 3 or 4 starter who MIGHT be a problem in NYC>. I know part of Gray's problem was the Yankees changed his pitching style but Whitson 2.0 is still a possibility.

Expand full comment
Ryder's Baseball Brilliance's avatar

McNeil and Guillorme are "interchangeable"? Is it baseball or English you know less about? Guillorme is a fat zero who had ONE good 42 PA month in his MLB career. McNeil has over 1000 PA of consistent excellence. Guillorme is not close to an MLB starter. Hopefully your next move will be to a site where you are invisible.

Expand full comment
Paul Schwartz's avatar

Interchangable means they can play any infield position. A brilliant critic like you must know that. AMIrite?

Expand full comment
Ryder's Baseball Brilliance's avatar

Interchangeable does not mean anything close to that.

Expand full comment